Bring Peace to the Ordinary for the Poor
In a political atmosphere where even those who do brand themselves as advocates for the poor in reality restrict their concern and efforts simply to whatever the media presents as an expedient over-arching “campaign issue,” we have come to insist that a serious initiative must take place to address the multitude of dire and urgent issues that the poor around the country must face from day to day; issues that are immediately clear to anyone who spends so much as one hour walking through their neighborhoods. We reject the notion that the fundamental rights of citizens that pertain to their more ordinary daily affairs must be left to the market or to local ordinances, and instead insist that our federal government respond to its call to safeguard these rights where appropriate.
We first fight for a nationwide end to localities adopting a permissive and essentially licentious attitude toward a few unruly residents of poor neighborhoods destroying the peace for everyone living in them; these residents being permitted to do so by police forces whose only orders are to respond to the serious crimes that (though also comprising a plague on the poor) are relatively rare when compared to the day-to-day peace that is lost (but at no cost to the local politician’s media image when he cites crime statistics) by blatantly aggressive driving; cars with sub-woofers and custom mufflers that rattle nearby windows; loud swearing that makes taking children outside a grave risk to their innocence; inappropriate music that must be heard by hundreds of people thanks to one person’s preferences; verbal harassment of the weak and strangers by those who deem themselves masters of their neighborhood, and so forth. But the freedom of speech guaranteed by the Constitution does not imply the freedom to utterly destroy the peace at a whim, and the lives of the poor would be drastically improved by authorities ceasing to permit those behaviors that needlessly disturb the life of those nearby. As our Constitution asserts, all have a right to equal treatment under the law, and this must also mean equal access to law enforcement’s benefits despite what neighborhood a person lives in, for what is allowed to transpire in poor neighborhoods would never be allowed to transpire in the more well off neighborhoods in this country.
We next fight to bring justice and charity to social services. When the poor go to the county Social Services Office for help, which is a cornerstone of many of their lives, they are too often treated as mere objects. This is the inevitable consequence of a system that completely lacks, in its very design, solidarity and subsidiarity. One result of this we see is that substance abuse, in the form of alcoholism, illegal drug abuse, and prescription drug addiction, has wreaked havoc on entire populations of poor, which is often initiated by or even consists in a social work system’s intervention that inundates with psychotropic medication those it ostensibly serves in order to make them easier to cope with. Such utter disregard for the totality of the person, though now so commonplace as to be presupposed by self-serving bureaucracies that seek only to check-the-box in saying they have dealt with a “case” and thereby secure further funding, is a trend that we fight with great effort. We strive to ensure that each person who is dealt with by the various Federal, State, and Local agencies involved in social work is treated in his or her individuality of both body and soul. This initiative, though no easy to define or undertake task, must consist in a greater cooperation with local groups (especially Churches and other faith-based endeavors), a more serious listening to the needs and wants of the individual and especially a greater consideration of his or her family and religious needs, a greater flexibility in addressing these needs without the burden of red tape and one-size-fits-all solutions (which must not merely become more money thrown at the problem), and other efforts to ensure that the entire Social Service System in this country serves the Common Good instead of merely perpetuating itself.
We next work to ensure that the urban poor are granted access to the same degree and quality of infrastructure that outlying wealthier suburbs have. We lament that while some politicians boast of their handout programs in a thinly veiled attempt to buy votes, their detachment from the poor makes them overlook something so simple yet fundamental as how poor people get from place to place. A poor single mother abandoned by the father of her child must often navigate dangerously damaged sidewalks with a stroller if she is lucky, but often must risk life and limb pushing it along the road due either to the total absence of a sidewalk, or its inability to be passed due to disrepair or lack of snowplowing. Meanwhile, in suburbs inhabited by the rich, barely used beautiful sidewalks stretch for miles and roads are routinely repaved even when completely unneeded. But the poor have a right to the same quality and presence of infrastructure that the rich do, and this must be federally ensured for all.
We next fight against the convenience store addictions that dominate the lives of so many of our nation’s poor because the government says that cigarettes are unfit for human consumption, but “generously” permits citizens to smoke them if only they will pay an enormous tax. Likewise gambling, in some places banned, is in other realms undertaken and monopolized by government entities who run lotteries as an additional and unbearable tax on those who understandably cannot resist the temptation to exhaust their already dangerously low income in pursuit of the minuscule prospect of becoming rich. In both cases the rich grow richer and the poor are exploited. We fight for a nationwide end to government run lotteries, and serious restrictions on privately run lotteries and gambling. We also call for a reduction of taxes that primarily affect the poor, especially for example on cigarettes (though we agree with efforts aimed at curbing cigarette smoking, we do not believe in doing so by financially punishing the poor), to have these revenues replaced by luxury taxes like those passed by Congress in the 1990s.
We next work to foster initiatives to enable the poor themselves to become the primary builders of better, cleaner, safer, and more beautiful neighborhoods. We lament the fact that, while huge percentages of the poor remain incapable of finding work, the houses in which they live are crumbling and vacant, decaying buildings are densely interspersed with those that are inhabited. Such a glaring disconnect can only be the result of serious injustices in the structure of modern society. While we first and foremost hope that the resolution of this problem will come from abolishing barriers to entry, promoting local living, protecting public beauty, and other efforts described in this platform, we also advocate for initiatives aimed directly at solving this problem, such as free basic home-renovation training for citizens who are willing to commit to a certain amount of local work in that industry, and the suspension of work-search of work requirements for these same citizens who are capable of demonstrating the progress they have made in such renovations.